Rethinking Water Safety: The Difference Between Heterotrophic Plate Counts and Copies/mL

Ensuring water safety is a complex challenge. As we strive to maintain high standards of water quality, we have historically relied on traditional methods like Heterotrophic Plate Counts (HPC). However, recent advancements in technology have prompted a reassessment of these methods, with copies/mL emerging as a superior alternative for safeguarding drinking water.

What are Heterotrophic Plate Counts (HPC)?

Heterotrophic Plate Counts (HPC) are used to estimate the total viable count of heterotrophic bacteria in a water sample. These bacteria are organisms that require organic carbon for growth and energy, and they are commonly found in various environments, including water sources.

HPC involves collecting a water sample and spreading a portion of it onto a nutrient-rich agar plate. The agar plate is then incubated at a specific temperature (typically around 35°C) for a set period, usually 24 to 48 hours. During incubation, heterotrophic bacteria present in the water sample will grow and form visible colonies on the agar surface.

After incubation, the colonies are counted, and the results are expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) or colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) of the original sample. The HPC value provides an indication of the overall microbial load in the water sample, representing the number of viable heterotrophic bacteria capable of growing under the conditions provided.

HPC is widely used as a standard method for assessing the general microbiological quality of water in various settings, including drinking water treatment plants, distribution systems, recreational water bodies, and industrial water supplies. HPC results are often used for monitoring changes in microbial abundance over time and identifying potential issues with water quality.

Yet, despite its utility in tracking changes in microbial abundance throughout treatment processes and distribution systems, HPC falls short as an indicator of water safety.

Why? Because HPC results alone do not directly correlate with the presence of harmful pathogens or indicate potential adverse health effects. While high HPC levels may suggest the need for further investigation or corrective action, they do not provide the specificity required to identify specific pathogens that pose risks to human health.

What does copies/mL mean?

Copies/mL is a measurement unit used to quantify the amount of specific genetic material, such as DNA or RNA, present in a given volume of sample. This measurement is commonly used for techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or quantitative PCR (qPCR), which are molecular biology methods used to amplify and quantify specific DNA or RNA sequences in a sample.

In PCR and qPCR, target nucleic acid sequences are amplified through a series of temperature cycles, resulting in an exponential increase in the number of copies of the target sequence. By monitoring the amplification process in real-time or at the end of the reaction, the initial amount of target nucleic acid in the sample can be quantified based on fluorescence signals or other detection methods.

The "copies/mL" measurement indicates the number of copies of the target sequence present in one milliliter of the original sample. This quantitative information provides an accurate picture of the concentration of specific genetic material in a sample, providing valuable insights into the presence and abundance of target organisms, such as pathogens or genetic markers of interest.

In the context of water safety, copies/mL measurements may be used to quantify the concentration of microbial pathogens or indicator organisms in water samples. In contrast to HPC, copies/mL methods offer a sensitive and precise means of detecting and quantifying microbial contaminants to determine water safety.

What is the difference between HPC and copies/mL?

Copies/mL measurements enable targeted detection. By focusing on the genetic signatures of known pathogens or indicators of contamination, copies/mL methods provide a direct assessment of potential health risks associated with specific waterborne contaminants. On the other hand, HPC measures the total viable count of heterotrophic bacteria, which includes a wide range of microorganisms, both harmful and harmless. Therefore, high HPC levels do not necessarily indicate the presence of specific pathogens that pose a risk to human health.

Furthermore, HPC relies on culturing bacteria on nutrient-rich agar plates and counting the resulting colonies. However, not all bacteria present in the sample may be able to grow under the conditions provided, leading to underestimation of microbial abundance. Instead, highly sensitive molecular assays, such as qPCR, can have very low limits of detection, sometimes reaching as few as 1 to 10 copies/mL. These assays are capable of detecting even trace amounts of target nucleic acid sequences present in a sample, ensuring pathogen contamination can be caught in the early stages.

Finally, the incubation period required for HPC analysis is typically 1-2 days, which can delay the detection of microbial contamination. Molecular methods can often obtain results within hours, enabling timely water quality assessments and facilitating prompt corrective actions as needed.

Conclusion

While HPC can provide insights into changes in microbial abundance over time and help identify potential issues with water quality, it does not directly assess the presence of pathogens or indicate the risk of waterborne disease transmission. Copies/mL methods represent a significant advancement in water safety assessment, offering targeted detection, sensitivity, rapidity, and quantitative analysis capabilities that surpass those of HPC.

About Kraken Sense

Kraken Sense develops all-in-one pathogen detection solutions to accelerate time to results by replacing lab testing with a single field-deployable device. Our proprietary device, the KRAKEN, has the ability to detect bacteria and viruses down to 1 copy. It has already been applied for epidemiology detection in wastewater and microbial contamination testing in food processing, among many other applications. Our team of highly-skilled Microbiologists and Engineers tailor the system to fit individual project needs. To stay updated with our latest articles and product launches, follow us on LinkedInTwitter, and Instagram, or sign up for our email newsletter. Discover the potential of continuous, autonomous pathogen testing by speaking to our team.

Previous
Previous

In-line Pathogen Detection at Critical Control Points (CCPs)

Next
Next

International Day of Plant Health: Safeguarding Plants and Crops through Pathogen Detection